In his recent post, Aaron Gleeman admits to being a big Michael Vick fan and says that the “growing sentiment that he is the NFL’s most overrated player is ridiculous”. I love Aaron’s writing. I read him daily. However, I don’t have to agree with him on everything.
Anyway, here was the response I posted on Aaron’s site about Vick.
——————————
I believe Vick is overated and here’s why. He’s a QB not a RB. As a player overall he’s definitely good. However, when you consider he’s a QB he’s below average.
I believe that the reason there’s a “growing sentiment that he is the NFL’s most overrated player” is because you have to compare his skills with others in the same position. He can’t do many of the things required of a QB.
In my mind the best use of Vick would be as a RB/WR/QB combined player. Have someone like Schaub as the real QB (especially since Atlanta wants to go to a more traditional West Coast offense) and put Vick all over the field. Think of Randle El from Pittsburgh but with more moves and speed. The matchup problems would be insane.
I will never be convinced that Vick is a good QB. A fun guy to watch? Yes. A good guy to have in fantasy football? Sometimes. A guy to lead a strong passing attack? Never.
————————
So, what do you think? Is Vick overrated or not? What is your reasoning?


